Thermal-induced Residual Stresses and Distortions in Friction Stir Welds - A Literature Review

Article information

Journal of Welding and Joining. 2021;39(4):409-418
Publication date (electronic) : 2021 August 11
doi : https://doi.org/10.5781/JWJ.2021.39.4.9
* Mechanical Design and Production Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Giza, 12613, Egypt
** Faculty of Engineering and Materials Science, German University in Cairo, New Cairo, 11835, Egypt
*** Faculty of Engineering, Zewail City of Science and Technology, Giza, 11341, Egypt
Corresponding author: ahmed.shash@cu.edu.eg, ahmed.shash@guc.edu.eg
Received 2021 March 11; Revised 2021 April 28; Accepted 2021 June 3.

Abstract

Friction Stir Welding (FSW) is a solid-state welding technique that uses the heat generated from friction to assemble a wide variety of materials. Irrespective of having a lower heat input as compared to conventional welding techniques, friction stir welds are still prone to significant thermal-induced stresses and distortions owing to the uneven heating and cooling cycles that a weld goes through. Surprisingly, not several reviews have addressed both the residual stresses and distortions of friction stir welds despite their crucial impact on the weld performance. Therefore, the current paper reviews their development, their correlation with process parameters, and ways to reduce them. Moreover, it explains the current status of process modeling and research gaps in the area of interest.

1. Introduction

Uneven heating and cooling cycles can leave a welded joint susceptible to significant residual stresses. Those stresses switch from tension to compression along the transverse direction, which, in some cases, can cause unwanted irregularities in the welded component. Dealing with the resulting irregularities is an expensive and time-consuming process. Unfortunately, owing to the welding process nature, the formation of residual stresses and their side-effects is inevitable and cannot be prevented. However, it can be controlled via process input parameters the ones that affect the amount of heat input directly.

Residual stresses and distortions in friction stir welds, also known as the “residual states”, have been investigated over the years, and many conclusions have been published. Nevertheless, the amount of research done in this area is still limited as compared to the amount of research devoted to investigating the effect of the process parameters on the mechanical properties. The same applies to the review articles publishing status over the past ten years. The authors herein are not trying to undermine the importance of analyzing process inputs-outputs correlations. They are, however, trying to bring a refreshing perspective to the field regarding this topic.

In 2011, Woo et al.1) reviewed residual stress measurement by Neutron diffraction. They covered its theoretical background, practical issues, and applications. In 2015, on the other hand, Hattel et al.2) reviewed the different modeling techniques of the residual stresses. Besides these two studies, the authors could not find any more reviews on welding-induced stresses. Moreover, no review to date has addressed thermal distortion in friction stir welds. Accordingly, the current paper is dedicated to covering the following topics:

  • Residual states development,

  • Effect of process parameters on residual states,

  • Residual states mitigation techniques,

  • Process modeling, and

  • Research gaps.

2. Residual States Development

Kumar et al.3) explained in their book how residual stresses develop in the first place. Their demonstration was used as a reference in the current section. Fig. 1 shows an illustration of residual stress development in friction stir welds. In Fig. 1a, the green rectangle represents the portion of the base material to be welded, while the blue ones represent the portions that will not undergo any changes. The latter acts as rigid constraints to the former, preventing it from free expansion/ contraction.

Fig. 1

Residual stress development illustration

During welding, the green region experiences a large amount of heat input for being in direct contact with the tool. As mentioned above, this region cannot expand freely due to its interaction with the adjacent material. Consequently, a compressive mechanical strain (emec) is introduced at T1, the peak welding temperature. Its value is equal to C, which is the same value of the thermal strain (eth) developed in the case of free thermal expansion at the same temperature (see Fig. 1b). If C is lower than the yield strain of the material, no dimensional changes will occur in the nugget zone (NZ). Otherwise, plastic deformation occurs, causing a permanent shape change.

Fig. 1c depicts the cooling stage during which the NZ would shrink if it were not for the rigid constraints. In other words, the adjacent material stretches the NZ from the position where it was allowed to shrink by strain C to the position where it does not shrink due to the presence of rigid constraints. Therefore, the NZ develops tensile stresses, reflecting its state. If the strain value outreaches the yield limit, lower tensile stresses are obtained due to stress relaxation triggered by permanent deformation.

In the absence of external constraints, the total sum of body forces must equal zero. Hence, the adjacent material forms compressive stresses to balance their tensile counterparts. Fig. 1d shows a typical residual stress distribution in the transverse direction. When compressive stresses exceed the critical buckling limit of the sheet, buckling distortion becomes inevitable upon de-clamping.

3. Effect of Process Parameters on Residual States

Residual properties are highly affected by the process parameters, especially the ones affecting the amount of heat input directly. So, it is no surprise that researchers have been investigating the effects of primary process parameters for the past few years. Parameters like rotational and traverse speeds are the most widely investigated ones, as proven in the next paragraphs.

He et al.4) investigated the effect of rotational speed on longitudinal tensile residual stress in thick AA6061 friction stir welds. Their results showed that residual stress slightly increased with increasing the rotational speed, which was the opposite of what Tutum and Hattel5) reported. This increase was attributed to the high temperatures associated with high rotational speeds. Also, all stress distributions were double-peaked, shaped like an “M.” The same observation was made back in 2003 by Peel et al.6), who studied the effect of traverse speed on residual stresses in AA5083 welds. Fig. 2 demonstrates the M-shaped residual stress profiles extracted from4).

Fig. 2

Longitudinal residual stress distributions

Meanwhile, Peel et al.6) reported a positive correlation between longitudinal tensile residual stress and traverse speed. Feng et al.7), Tutum and Hattel5), and Farajkhah and Liu8) published an equivalent conclusion in their studies. They all agree that large heat input associated with low traverse speeds results in a more uniform thermal gradient along the transverse direction, causing a lower thermal contraction mismatch between the HAZ and adjacent material during cooling. Hence, reduced tensile residual stresses are obtained at low speeds and vice versa. Fig. 3 highlights the relationship between longitudinal residual stress and operating speeds.

Fig. 3

Residual stress at different operating conditions

While several authors claim that increasing the traverse speed increases the longitudinal tensile residual stress, others claim the opposite. Buffa et al.9) and Camilleri et al.10) mentioned in their studies that the correlation did not have to be always positive. However, no detailed explanation was provided by both research groups. Their statement should be taken with caution as not many publications reported such an observation.

The above-mentioned studies were mainly focused on longitudinal tensile residual stress in friction stir welds. Regarding out-of-plane distortion, not only is it influenced by processing speeds, but also sheet dimensions. Shi et al.11) explored the effects of rotational speed, traverse speed, and sheet length on the geometric imperfection of AA6013 panels. Their experiments showed that increasing the rotational speed and sheet length could increase the distortion. Meanwhile, traverse speed did not show any significance whatsoever. Likewise, Zhang et al.12) conducted a computational investigation of the size effects on AA6061 residual states. They concluded that sheet width had more control over distortion than the length, which was similar to what Costa et al.13) published recently.

According to most distortion-related studies11-15), friction stir welded sheets exhibit an “anti-saddle” pattern after de-clamping. In other words, they become concave in the transverse direction and convex in the longitudinal direction14). Shi et al.11) attributed the reversed saddle profile to the extension difference between the top and bottom sheet layers. During welding, the top layer is extruded by the tool in the welding direction, unlike the bottom layer, which is in almost rigid contact with the backing plate and cannot experience such interaction. Fig. 4 demonstrates the typical distortion shape after the FSW process.

Fig. 4

Typical distortion shape of friction-stir welds

4. Residual States Mitigation Techniques

The formation of residual properties cannot be prevented but can be controlled by process input parameters to a certain limit. Beyond this limit, the residuals cannot be reduced further without the need for secondary thermal/mechanical loads. Hattel et al.2) listed in their review four reduction techniques that were proposed by other researchers over time. The techniques are:

  1. Thermal Tensioning,

  2. Mechanical Tensioning,

  3. Surface Treatment, and

  4. Post-Weld Direct Rolling

4.1 Thermal Tensioning

The general idea of “Thermal Tensioning” is to stretch the weld zone before or during welding by imposing a preset temperature gradient16,17). This thermal difference should allow for more expansion of the weld zone, thereby reducing its plasticity, which is the source of residual stresses and distortions18). The technique can be implemented statically or dynamically. The former is referred to as “Steady-State Thermal Tensioning, STT,” while the latter is known as “Transient Thermal Tensioning, TTT.” Fig. 5 displays the difference between STT and TTT.

Fig. 5

Thermal tensioning technique, (a) Steady-State Thermal Tensioning (STT), (b) Transient Thermal Tensioning (TTT)

STT requires a combination of cooling and heating before and during welding. According to Michaleris and Sun16), STT with elastic pre-bending could minimize buckling and angular distortions of AH36 steel panels. The downside of STT is the cost of the apparatus, making it impractical for industrial applications2). TTT, on the other hand, does not have this limitation. In TTT, two moving heat sources are applied to each side of the main torch during welding only, which cuts the cooling equipment costs. Despite its cost-effectiveness, TTT is a complex optimization problem, as presented by Michaleris et al.17), that involves intense computational runs to determine the optimum size and intensity of heating bands as well as their distances from the main torch. It is worth mentioning that little to no work has addressed STT and TTT applicability to the FSW process.

4.2 Mechanical Tensioning

The general idea of “Mechanical Tensioning, MT” is very similar to that of “Thermal Tensioning.” However, instead of stretching the part thermally, it is clamped from one end and pulled mechanically from the opposite side. The mechanical pull must remain uniform before and during welding. Fig. 6 shows a schematic representation of the technique. According to Price et al.19), MT was successful in flattening the residual stress profile and, hence, eliminating buckling distortion of AA2024 sheets. Nevertheless, like STT, MT is not widely used due to the expense of its equipment18).

Fig. 6

Mechanical tensioning process

4.3 Surface Treatment

The surface treatment takes on many forms. Some of which are shot, laser, and needle peening. They all share the concept of introducing single or multiple layers of compressive residual stress near the part’s surface by impact. The source and mechanism of impact are what differentiate one form from another. Fig. 7 highlights the difference between the above-mentioned forms. The compressive pressure wave in shot and needle peening is formed by mechanical impact. On the other hand, in laser peening, the pressure is formed by the rapidly expanding plasma trapped between the workpiece and the tamping layer20).

Fig. 7

Surface treatment processes, (a) Shot peening, (b) Laser peening, (c) Needle peening.

Hatamleh et al.21) highlighted the ability of laser peening to enhance the mechanical properties of AA7075 friction stir welds. Moreover, they stated that shot peening had minimal effect on the properties compared to its laser counterpart. For AA2024 sheets, Larose et al.22) managed to reduce the distortion with needle peening by 37 % and 82 % in both transverse and longitudinal directions, respectively. With their study, they introduced needle peening as an effective mitigation technique.

4.4 Post-Weld Direct Rolling

As the name implies, Post-Weld Direct Rolling (PWDR) is a mitigation technique that takes place after the welding process is done. As shown in Fig. 8, a roller is pressed against the weld and moved in the longitudinal direction. When the weld is squeezed in the thickness direction, it elongates in the other two directions due to volume constancy. Furthermore, tensile residual stresses are relieved and become compressive. The magnitude of rolling-induced compressive stresses depends on the roller size and downward force. Based on the results from Altenkirch et al.23) and Wen et al.24), PWDR is a very enabling technology with great potential in the aerospace sector.

Fig. 8

Post-weld direct rolling

4.5 Stationary Shoulder Friction Stir Welding

Stationary Shoulder Friction Stir Welding (SSFSW) is a relatively new variant of the conventional FSW process. Its tool consists of a pin that rotates independently of its shoulder (see Fig. 9). The external stationary shoulder absorbs a large portion of frictional heat, thereby reducing the peak welding temperature. Hence, a narrower NZ and tensile region are obtained. Recent studies25-27) reported promising results regarding the capability of SSFSW as an in-situation mitigation technique. As compared to other techniques, SSFSW does not require expensive apparatus, making it practical for both research and industrial applications.

Fig. 9

Stationary shoulder friction stir welding

5. Residual States Modeling Status

Finite Element Modeling (FEM) has always been a useful tool for analyzing different aspects of the FSW process, such as transient temperature fields, thermal-induced stress fields, and material flow patterns. The reason is that FEM can obtain instantaneous results and save research time and cost. Table 1 lists a few examples from the literature.

Examples of FE models developed by different authors over the years

By analyzing the data in Table 1, it can be concluded that transient heat transfer is the most numerically investigated process aspect. The same applies to active/residual stress analysis. On the other hand, the total number of numerical studies dedicated to out-of-plane distortion, material flow, and metallurgical properties, such as hardness and grain size, is still deficient, as shown in Fig. 10. The degree of complexity and computational cost are the main constraints of these kinds of studies. It can also be concluded that only 23 % of researchers have considered symmetry in their publications regardless of the asymmetric nature of the FSW process. According to McCune et al.15), the asymmetrical variations caused by the tool torque have an insignificant effect on heat and stress distributions.

Fig. 10

Frequency analysis of the numerical studies conducted within the past 20 years

6. Conclusions

The current literature review was mainly focused on welding-induced residual stress and distortion development, controlling parameters, and mitigation techniques. It also reflected on the present status of the FSW process modeling. In light of the gathered information, five literature gaps were discovered. First, little to no work has addressed the effects of tool geometry, tilt angle, and plunge depth on the residual states of friction stir welds. Second, no study to date has examined the statistical significance of process parameters plus their interactions in affecting welds’ residual properties. Third, no study, to our knowledge, has discussed the applicability of thermal tensioning to the FSW process. Fourth, SSFSW is a promising mitigation technique that still requires a thorough investigation. Fifth, only a few numerical models have been developed to predict out-ofplane distortion, material flow patterns, and metallurgical properties of friction stir welds.

References

1. Woo W, Feng Z, Wang X. L, David S. A. Neutron diffraction measurements of residual stresses in friction stir welding:A review. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join 162011;:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217110X12731414739916.
2. Hattel J. H, Sonne M. R, Tutum C. C. Modelling residual stresses in friction stir welding of Al alloys a review of possibilities and future trends. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol 762015;:1793–1805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6394-2.
3. Kumar N, Mishra R. S, Baumann J. A. Model for Understanding Residual Stress Development in Friction Stir Welded Structures. In:Residual Stresses in Friction Stir Welding. 1st edition Butterworth-Heinemann 2013;:28–35.
4. He J, Ling Z, Li H. Effect of tool rotational speed on residual stress, microstructure, and tensile properties of friction stir welded 6061-T6 aluminum alloy thick plate. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol 842016;:1953–1961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7859-7.
5. Tutum C. C, Hattel J. H. Optimisation of process parameters in friction stir welding based on residual stress analysis:a feasibility study. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join 152010;:369–377. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217110x12707333260455.
6. Peel M, Steuwer A, Preuss M, Withers P. J. Microstructure, mechanical properties and residual stresses as a function of welding speed in aluminium AA5083 friction stir welds. Acta. Mater 512003;:4791–4801. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00319-7.
7. Feng Z, Wang X. L, David S. A, Sklad P. S. Modelling of residual stresses and property distributions in friction stir welds of aluminium alloy 6061-T6. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join 122007;:348–356. https://doi.org/10.1179/174329307X197610.
8. Liu V, Farajkhah Y. Effect of clamping area and welding speed on the friction stir welding-induced residual stresses. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol 902017;:339–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9393-7.
9. Buffa G, Ducato A, Fratini L. Numerical procedure for residual stresses prediction in friction stir welding. Finite. Elem. Anal. Des 472011;:470–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2010.12.018.
10. Camilleri D, Micallef D, Mollicone P. Thermal stresses and distortion developed in mild steel DH36 friction stir-welded plates:An experimental and numerical assessment. J. Therm. Stress 382015;:485–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495739.2015.1015856.
11. Shi Q. Y, Silvanus J, Liu Y, Li H. K. Experimental study on distortion of Al-6013 plate after friction stir welding. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join 132008;:472–478. https://doi.org/10.1179/174329308x341924.
12. Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Zhang . Numerical investigations of size effects on residual states of friction stir weld. Proceeding of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B:J. Eng. Manuf 2282014;:572–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405413506191.
13. Costa M. I, Leitão C, Rodrigues D. M. Parametric study of friction stir welding induced distortion in thin aluminium alloy plates:A coupled numerical and experimental analysis. Thin.Walled. Struct 1342019;:268–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.10.027.
14. Yan D. Y, Wu A. P, Silvanus J, Shi Q. Y. Predicting residual distortion of aluminum alloy stiffened sheet after friction stir welding by numerical simulation. Mater. Des 322011;:2284–2291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.032.
15. McCune R. W, Murphy A, Price M, Butterfield J. The influence of friction stir welding process idealization on residual stress and distortion predictions for future airframe assembly simulations. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Trans 1342012;:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006554.
16. Sun P, Michaleris X. Finite element analysis of thermal tensioning techniques mitigating weld buckling distortion. Weld. J 761997;451-s.
17. Michaleris P, Dantzig J, Tortorelli D. Minimization of welding residual stress and distortion in large structures. Weld. J 78 (1999) 361-s.
18. Tamma K. K. Encyclopedia of Thermal Stresses. Springer Publishers 2013;
19. Price D. A, Williams S. W, Wescott A, Rezai C. J, Harrison A, Peel A. M, Staron P, Kocak M. Steuwer, Distortion control in welding by mechanical tensioning. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join 122007;:620–633. https://doi.org/10.1179/174329307x213864.
20. Hatamleh O. The effects of laser peening and shot peening on mechanical properties in friction stir welded 7075-T7351 aluminum. J. Mater. Eng. Perform 172008;:688–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-007-9163-7.
21. Hatamleh O, Lyons J, Forman R. Laser and shot peening effects on fatigue crack growth in friction stir welded 7075-T7351 aluminum alloy joints. Int. J. Fatigue 292007;:421–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.05.007.
22. Larose S, Dubourg L, Perron C, Jahazi M, Wanjara P. Limitation of Distortion in Friction Stir Welded (FSW) Panels Using Needle Peening. Mater. Sci. Forum 638(642)2010;:1203–1208. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.638-642.1203.
23. Altenkirch J, Steuwer A, Withers P. J, Williams S. W, Poad M, Wen S. W. Residual stress engineering in friction stir welds by roller tensioning. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join 142009;:185–192. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217108x388624.
24. Wen S. W, Colegrove P. A, Williams S. W, Morgan S.A, Wescott A, Poad M. Rolling to control residual stress and distortion in friction stir welds. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join 152010;:440–447. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217110x12785889549787.
25. He W, Li M, Song Q, Liu J, Hu W. Efficacy of External Stationary Shoulder for Controlling Residual Stress and Distortion in Friction Stir Welding. Trans. Indian Inst. Met 722019;:1349–1359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-019-01630-2.
26. He W, Liu J, Hu W, Wang G, Chen W. Controlling residual stress and distortion of friction stir welding joint by external stationary shoulder. High Temp. Mater. Process, 382019;:662–671. https://doi.org/10.1515/htmp-2019-0005.
27. Vicharapu B, Liu H, Fujii H, Narasaki K, Ma N, De A. Probing residual stresses in stationary shoulder friction stir welding process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1062020;:1573–1586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04570-9.
28. Frigaard Ø, Grong Ø, Midling O. T. A process model for friction stir welding of age hardening aluminum alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 322001;:1189–1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-001-0128-4.
29. Chao Y. J, Qi X, Tang W. Heat transfer in friction stir welding Experimental and numerical studies. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Trans 1252003;:138–145. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1537741.
30. Chen C. M, Kovacevic R. Finite element modeling of friction stir welding Thermal and thermomechanical analysis. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf 432003;:1319–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00158-5.
31. Khandkar M. Z. H, Khan J. A, Reynolds A. P. Prediction of temperature distribution and thermal history during friction stir welding:Input torque based model. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join 82003;:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217103225010943.
32. Kovacevic M, Song R. Thermal modeling of friction stir welding in a moving coordinate system and its validation. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf 432003;:605–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00022-1.
33. Xu X, Deng S. Two-dimensional finite element simulation of material flow in the friction stir welding process. J, Manuf. Process 62004;:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-6125(04)70066-3.
34. Zhu X. K, Chao Y. J. Numerical simulation of transient temperature and residual stresses in friction stir welding of 304L stainless steel. J. Mater. Process Technol 1462004;:263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.025.
35. Cho J. H, Boyce D. E, Dawson P. R. Modeling strain hardening and texture evolution in friction stir welding of stainless steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 3982005;:146–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.03.002.
36. Buffa L, Fratini G. CDRX modelling in friction stir welding of aluminium alloys. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf 452005;:1188–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.12.001.
37. Hattel H, Schmidt J. A local model for the thermomechanical conditions in friction stir welding. Model Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng 132005;:77–93. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/13/1/006.
38. Soundararajan V, Zekovic S, Kovacevic R. Thermomechanical model with adaptive boundary conditions for friction stir welding of Al 6061. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf 452005;:1577–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.02.008.
39. Desrayaud C, Ringeval S, Girard S, Driver J. H. A novel high straining process for bulk materials The development of a multipass forging system by compression along three axes. J. Mater. Process Technol 1722006;:152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.015.
40. Khandkar M. Z. H, Khan J. A, Reynolds A. P, Sutton M. A. Predicting residual thermal stresses in friction stir welded metals. J. Mater. Process. Technol 1742006;:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.12.013.
41. Uyyuru R. K, Kallas S. V. Numerical analysis of friction stir welding process. J, Mater, Eng, Perform 152006;:505–518. https://doi.org/10.1361/105994906X136070.
42. Murphy A, McCune W, Quinn D, Price M. The characterisation of friction stir welding process effects on stiffened panel buckling performance. Thin-Walled Struct 452007;:339–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2007.02.007.
43. Zhang H. W, Zhang Z, Chen J. T. 3D modeling of material flow in friction stir welding under different process parameters. J. Mater. Process Technol 1832007;:62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.09.027.
44. Bastier A, Maitournam M. H, Roger F, Dang V. K. Modelling of the residual state of friction stir welded plates. J. Mater. Process Technol 2002008;:25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.083.
45. Schmidt H. B, Hattel J. H. Thermal modelling of friction stir welding. Scr. Mater 582008;:332–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.008.
46. Michaleris X, Qin P. Themo-elasto-viscoplastic modelling of friction stir welding. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join 142009;:640–649. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217109X12464549883457.
47. Assidi M, Fourment L, Guerdoux S, Nelson T. Friction model for friction stir welding process simulation:Calibrations from welding experiments. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf 502010;:143–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.11.008.
48. Prasanna P, Rao B. S, M. Rao G. K. Finite element modeling for maximum temperature in friction stir welding and its validation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol 512010;:925–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2693-4.
49. Richards D. G, Prangnell P. B, Withers P. J, Willams S. W, Nagy T, Morgan S. Efficacy of active cooling for controlling residual stresses in friction stir welds. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join 152010;:156–165. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217109X12590746472490.
50. Wang L, Davies C. M, Wimpory R. C, Xie L. Y, Nikbin K. M. Measurement and simulation of temperature and residual stress distributions from friction stir welding AA2024 Al alloy. Mater. High. Temp 272010;:167–178. https://doi.org/10.3184/096034010X12813743510192.
51. Jacquin D, Meester B. D, Simar A A, Delosion D, Montheillet F, Desrayaud C. A simple Eulerian thermomechanical modeling of friction stir welding. J. Mater. Process Technol 2112011;:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.08.016.
52. Riahi M, Nazari H. Analysis of transient temperature and residual thermal stresses in friction stir welding of aluminum alloy 6061-T6 via numerical simulation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol 552011;:143–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-3038-z.
53. Jamshidi A. H, Serajzadeh S, Kokabi A. H. Experimental and theoretical evaluations of thermal histories and residual stresses in dissimilar friction stir welding of AA5086-AA6061. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol 612012;:149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3713-8.
54. Al-Badour F, Merah N, Shuaib A, Bazoune A. Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian finite element modeling of friction stir welding processes. J. Mater. Process Technol 2132013;:1433–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.02.014.
55. Mun H. S, Seo S. I. Welding strain analysis of friction stir-welded aluminum alloy structures using inherent strain-based equivalent loads. J. Mech. Sci. Technol 272013;:2775–2782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-013-0724-4.
56. Sonne M. R, Tutum C. C, Hattel J. H, Simar A, Meester B. D. The effect of hardening laws and thermal softening on modeling residual stresses in FSW of aluminum alloy 2024-T3. J. Mater. Process Technol 2132013;:477–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.11.001.
57. Darvazi A. R, Iranmanesh M. Prediction of asymmetric transient temperature and longitudinal residual stress in friction stir welding of 304L stainless steel. Mater. Des 552014;:812–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.030.
58. Shi L, Wu C. S, Liu H. J. Numerical analysis of heat generation and temperature field in reverse dual rotation friction stir welding. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol 742014;:319–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5967-4.
59. Casavola C, Cazzato A, Moramarco V, Pappalettere C. Influence of the clamps configuration on residual stresses field in friction stir welding process. J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des 502015;:232–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309324715573361.
60. Shi L, Wu C. S, Liu X. C. Modeling the effects of ultrasonic vibration on friction stir welding. J. Mater. Process Technol 2222015;:91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.03.002.
61. Asadi P, Givi M. K.B, Akbari M. Simulation of dynamic recrystallization process during friction stir welding of AZ91 magnesium alloy. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol 832016;:301–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7595-z.
62. Aziz S. B, Dewan M. W, Huggett D. J, Wahab M. A, Okeil A. M, Liao T. W. Impact of Friction Stir Welding (FSW) process parameters on thermal modeling and heat generation of aluminum alloy joints. Acta. Metall. Sin 29(2016):869–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-016-0466-2.
63. Bachmann M, Carstensen J, Bergmann L, Santos J. F. D, Song C. S, Rethmeier M. Numerical simulation of thermally induced residual stresses in friction stir welding of aluminum alloy 2024-T3 at different welding speeds. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol 912017;:1443–1452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9793-8.
64. Dialami N, Cervera M, Chiumenti M, Saracibar C. A. D. Local-global strategy for the prediction of residual stresses in FSW processes. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol 882017;:3099–3111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9016-3.
65. Hou Z, Sheikh-Ahmad J, Jarrar F, Ozturk F. Residual Stresses in Dissimilar Friction Stir Welding of AA2024 and AZ31:Experimental and Numerical Study. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Trans 1402018;:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039074.
66. Yu H, Zheng B, Lai X. A modeling study of welding stress induced by friction stir welding. J. Mater. Process Technol 2542018;:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.11.022.
67. Salimi S, Bahemmat P, Haghpanahi M. Study on residual stresses caused by underwater friction stir welding:FE modeling and ultrasonic measurement. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechnical Engineers, Part E:J. Process Mech. Eng 2332019;:118–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408917751963.
68. Zhang X. X, Wu L. H, Andrä H, Gan W. M, Hofmann M, Wang D, Ni D. R, Xiao B. L, Ma Z. Y. Effects of welding speed on the multiscale residual stresses in friction stir welded metal matrix composites. J. Mater. Sci. Technol 352019;:824–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2018.11.005.
69. Xu X, Yu H, Lin Z. Study of residual stress variation with depth of friction stir welded aluminium plates with different thicknesses. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join 252020;:297–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621718.2019.1693722.
70. Yu H, Li Y, Xu X, Zheng B. Out-of-plane distortion prediction of large thin-walled structures induced by friction stir welding. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join 252020;:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621718.2019.1610603.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Residual stress development illustration

Fig. 2

Longitudinal residual stress distributions

Fig. 3

Residual stress at different operating conditions

Fig. 4

Typical distortion shape of friction-stir welds

Fig. 5

Thermal tensioning technique, (a) Steady-State Thermal Tensioning (STT), (b) Transient Thermal Tensioning (TTT)

Fig. 6

Mechanical tensioning process

Fig. 7

Surface treatment processes, (a) Shot peening, (b) Laser peening, (c) Needle peening.

Fig. 8

Post-weld direct rolling

Fig. 9

Stationary shoulder friction stir welding

Table 1

Examples of FE models developed by different authors over the years

Authors Year Form. Sym. Field output
Temp. SS Distort. Mat. Flow Met.
Frigaard et al.28) 2001 - No
Chao et al.29) 2003 L Yes
Chen and Kovacevic30) 2003 L Yes
Khandkar et al.31) 2003 L No
Song and Kovacevic32) 2003 L Yes
Deng and Xu33) 2004 ALE No
Zhu and Chao34) 2004 L Yes
Chao et al.35) 2005 CEL No
Fratini and Buffa36) 2005 ALE No
Schmidt and Hattel37) 2005 ALE No
Soundararajan et al.38) 2005 L No
Heurtier et al.39) 2006 - No
Khandkar et al.40) 2006 L No
Uyyuru and Kailas41) 2006 L No
Feng et al.7) 2007 L Yes
Murphy et al.42) 2007 L No
Zhang et al.43) 2007 ALE No
Bastier et al.44) 2008 ALE No
Schmidt and Hattel45) 2008 CFD No
Qin and Michaleris46) 2009 CEL No
Assidi et al.47) 2010 ALE No
Prasanna et al.48) 2010 - No
Richards et a.49) 2010 L No
Tutum and Hattel5) 2010 L Yes
Wang et al.50) 2010 L No
Buffa et al.9) 2011 L No
Jacquin et al.51) 2011 CEL No
Riahi and Nazari52) 2011 L No
Yan et al.14) 2011 L No
Aval et al.53) 2012 ALE No
McCune et al.15) 2012 L No
Al-Badour et al.54) 2013 CEL No
Mun and Seo55) 2013 L Yes
Sonne et al.56) 2013 L Yes
Darvazi and Iranmanesh57) 2014 L No
Shi et al.58) 2014 CEL No
Zhang et al.12) 2014 L No
Camilleri et al.10) 2015 L No
Casavola et al.59) 2015 L Yes
Shi et al.60) 2015 CFD No
Asadi et al.61) 2016 - No
Aziz et al.62) 2016 ALE No
Bachmann et al.63) 2017 L Yes
Dialami et al.64) 2017 ALE No
Farajkhah and Liu8) 2017 L No
Hou et al.65) 2018 CEL No
Yu et al.66) 2018 L No
Costa et al.13) 2019 L Yes
He et al.25) 2019 L No
Salimi et al.67) 2019 CEL No
Zhang et al.68) 2019 L Yes
Xu et al.69) 2020 L No
Yu et al.70) 2020 L No

Fig. 10

Frequency analysis of the numerical studies conducted within the past 20 years